|
6.1.4 Roof
Greening
In addition to larger and smaller
green spaces in the city, roof greening can also reduce urban
climatic deficits in relation to humidity and the thermal milieu
(HOESCHELE et al., 1974). There are also advantages to roof
greening from the perspective of building design. Roofs in
cities and towns offer reserves of surfaces, largely unused up
until the present day, that can be employed for the creation of
green spaces (Figure
6/4a - 6/4e). While residential, office, and industrial
buildings present themselves for greening in built-up areas,
garages and auxiliary buildings located in more rural areas
typically exhibit flat or low-angle (up to 15 degrees) roofs.
On these kinds of roofs it is almost always possible to
install multiform vegetation at comparatively small expense.
Although these roofs are not always actively useable, e.g.
as greened seating spaces, greened roofs in contrast with
monotonous gravel, bitumen, or sheet metal surfaces can
continually improve the climate, filter pollutants, and save
heating energy.
A measurable long-distance effect cannot be attributed to
greened roof surfaces; however, the effect of many small
individual roofs in a city does add up significantly.
Climatic Effects
The positive thermal
effects from roof greening are found predominantly in the
reduction of temperature extremes throughout the year (KOLB,
1989). Figure
6/5 shows an example of the
temperature characteristics of various construction materials
for roof surfaces on a summer day with intense sunlight.
While gravel roofs and black bitumen pasteboard heat up to
between 50°C and 80°C, the maximum temperatures on greened
roofs amount to roughly 20°C to 25°C.
On clear winter nights the temperature of non-greened roofs
can sink as low as -20°C. The annual fluctuation in
temperature thus amounts to about 100 degrees. Greened roofs
cool in winter only to slightly below 0°C, so that the annual
fluctuation amounts to only 30 degrees.
In summer a large part of the sunlight that a green roof
receives is converted to evaporate water (cf. Chapter
2.4). The evaporation of 1 liter of water at normal
air pressure requires 2,250 kJ without a rise in temperature.
The same amount of energy, however, can heat 100 m3
of air by 18 degrees Celsius. Green roofs are altogether an
effective measure for the protection of underlying spaces
against summer heat. In winter, the vegetation and the roof
substrate reduces the amount of escaping heat and thus
increases the heat insulation of the building below.
.
Effects on Water
Resources
All open areas of vegetation are capable of storing surface
water. According to the type of vegetation, water from
precipitation is retained for various durations in the upper
layers and then flows out, minus the amount lost in
evaporation and transpiration. Table 6/2 below shows
the proportion of rainwater that is carried off by drainage
(i.e. discharge factors).
80% to 100% of the precipitation on standard roofs is
carried off by drainage, whereas the amount is only 30% on
green roofs. The remainder is released back into the air via
evaporation and thus contributes decisively to reducing the
lack of humidity in the city that results from soil capping. A
further advantage of roof greening is the delayed release of
precipitation water, which substantially relieves the city
drainage system and reduces the danger of flooding (OHLWEIN,
1984).
.
|
Kind of the surface
|
Discharge factors
|
| . |
|
|
Roofs (> 15 degrees of inclination)
|
1,0
|
|
Roofs (< 15 degrees of inclination)
|
0,8
|
|
Gravel pouring roofs
|
0,5
|
|
Roof gardens
|
0,3
|
| . |
|
|
Concrete surfaces
|
0,9
|
|
Footpaths with plates or cinder
|
0,6
|
|
Play- and sports fields
|
0,25
|
|
larger gardens
|
0,1
|
|
Parks, allotment- and settlement gardens
|
0,05
|
Table 6/2: Discharge
factors for various surfaces, DIN 1986 (1978)
Legal Bases
According to § 74 (3) 2. of the State Building Ordinance
(LBO), municipalities enact a statue for the entire municipal
area or a portion thereof requiring that facilities for
retaining precipitation water must be constructed in order to
relieve drainage systems, avoid danger of flooding, and preserve
water resources. Even though aspects of water efficiency are of
primary concern here, measures of this type also work against
soil capping and its disadvantageous climatic consequences.
Roof greening can be established as legally binding in a site
plan. The roof form (flat roof) is based on § 74 LBO and the
greening on § 9 (1) 25 BauGB, which empowers the municipality
to require planting on parts of built facilities.
As with every other regulation, this can only be implemented
after fair consideration of all affected interests (§ 1 (6)
BauGB). To be considered, for example, are fire protection,
humidity and corrosion protection, and the costs of the planting
inclusive of potentially higher construction costs resulting
from the additional burden on the roof. These must be
incorporated in the reasoning for the site plan.
Following are examples for these types of regulations:
"Greened flat roof; the roof surfaces are to be planted
and maintained with a dirt layer of at least 40 cm. Exceptions
can be made for light fixtures, glass sections, and terraces, if
these serve the building’s purpose of use and are subordinated
(§ 9 (1) 25. BauGB)."
or:
"Flat roofs (0 to 15 degrees inclination) are to be planted
over a proportion of at least 60% of the roof surface – with
the exception of surfaces for technical roof systems – with a
substrate layer of at least 8 cm of grasses, soil-covering
plants, and wild herbs, and are to be so maintained (§ 9 (1)
25. BauGB). Exceptions for solar energy facilities can be
allowed."
Regulations for roof greening can also be issued as localized
construction specifications according to § 74 (1) 1. LBO.
The regulatory possibilities for defining the purposes,
placement, and design of roof surfaces and facilities according
to the design specifications of the LBO also support the goal of
erecting solar energy apparatuses (in the form of collectors or
photovoltaic devices) when these are intended for long-term
effective use (BUNZEL et al., 1997).
Conflicts between the interests of solar energy use and the
goals associated with roof greening are seldom to be expected,
since those roofs best suited for solar devices (i.e. inclined
roofs) are not suited for planting. Figure
6/4a, incidentally, shows a photovoltaic device
installed on a green roof.
|
|
|
.
|
|

|
|
Fig. 6/4a:
Example of a green roof (parking garage for the Stuttgart city hall) |
| .. |
|

|
|
Fig. 6/4b:
Example of a green roof Office for environmental protection of
Stuttgart) |
| .. |
|

|
|
Fig. 6/4c: Example
of a green roof (Chamber of Commerce and industrie Stuttgart) |
| .. |
|

|
|
Fig. 6/4d: Example
of a green roof (Swabia center Stuttgart) |
| .. |
|

|
|
Fig. 6/4e:
Example of a green roof (College of music in Stuttgart) |
|
.. |
|

|
|
Fig. 6/4f:
Example of a green roof with Photovoltaik (Dresden) |
|
|
|

|
|
Fig. 6/5:
Temporal temperature gradients of flat roofs with various exterior
surface materials on a sunny summer day (from GERTIS et al., 1977) |
|